|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]田其云,童丽.室内家具污染致人损害的生产者责任研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(6):38-46.
 TIAN Qiyun,TONG Li.Study on Producer Liability for Human Damages Caused by Indoor Furniture Pollution[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2018,17(6):38-46.
点击复制

室内家具污染致人损害的生产者责任研究()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
17
期数:
2018年第6期
页码:
38-46
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Producer Liability for Human Damages Caused by Indoor Furniture Pollution
文章编号:
1671-7287(2018)06-0038-09
作者:
田其云童丽
中国海洋大学 法政学院, 山东 青岛 266100
Author(s):
TIAN Qiyun TONG Li
School of Law & Political Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
关键词:
室内家具污染 生产者责任 产品责任 环境污染责任
Keywords:
indoor furniture pollution producer liability product liability environmental pollution liability
分类号:
D922.683;D923.7
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国室内家具污染致害情况屡见不鲜,相关侵权诉讼在各地法院亦有审理,但关于此类案件的案由不一,有的案件以产品侵权为案由,有的案件以环境侵权为案由,导致法院据此审判的结果相去甚远。案由分歧的实质是对室内家具污染的责任形式认识不统一,目前学界的观点主要分为两类:产品责任、环境污染责任。通过对两种责任的相关制度进行比较,进而对受害人、加害人、司法者等相关主体的利益进行衡量分析,认为室内家具污染致人损害案件的生产者责任应归为环境污染责任,这样更能达到利益均衡。
Abstract:
It is common that the damage caused by indoor furniture pollution initiates the related tort litigation in China. Notably, there is no unified nature of cases on indoor furniture pollution. Some district courts affirmed that indoor furniture pollution is applicable to product tort liability, others courts classified such cases as environmental tort. Therefore, the lawsuit results may be at opposite poles. Essentially, conflicts in judging the nature of cases can be attributed to the disagreements in forms of liability which fall into two categories: product tort liability and environmental tort liability. Through the comparison of the relative systems and measuring the interests of victims, offenders and other relevant parties, we hold that the producer liability for cases of human damages caused by indoor furniture pollution should be classified as environmental tort.

参考文献/References:

[1]朱迪迪,戴海夏,钱华.我国室内空气污染现状调研与分析[J].上海环境科学,2014(4):174-180.
[2]马俊驹,余延满.民法原论[M].第四版.北京:法律出版社,2013:1059.
[3]宋治礼.室内装修污染是产品侵权责任[J].吉林省教育学院学报,2009(6):92-95.
[4]权卉.全国首例家装污染案民事责任分析[D].兰州:兰州大学,2012:19-20.
[5]邹雄,蓝华生.环境污染责任适用范围辨析:《侵权责任法》第八章解读之一[J].海峡法学,2011(1):10-15.
[6]屈茂辉.中国民法[M].北京:法律出版社,2009:613.
[7]马俊驹,余延满.民法原论[M].第四版.北京:法律出版社,2013:991.
[8]江伟,肖建国.民事诉讼法[M].第六版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013:204.
[9]焦程程.试析审判实务中环境侵权因果关系的认定:兼论因果关系推定与因果关系举证责任倒置的关系[J].法制与社会,2012(2):134-137.
[10]金瑞林.环境法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期]2017-12-18
[基金项目]青岛市社科规划项目“青岛生态安全司法中的利益衡量”(QDSKL1401100)
[作者简介]田其云(1966-),男,重庆人,中国海洋大学法政学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:环境与资源保护法学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-10