|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]史秋霞.“沙拉碗”式融合理念下的新加坡华族社群融合研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(2):87-96.
 SHI Qiuxia.Study on theIntegration of Ethnic Chinese Groupsin Singaporeunder the Idea of ″Salad Bowl″[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2018,17(2):87-96.
点击复制

“沙拉碗”式融合理念下的新加坡华族社群融合研究()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
17
期数:
2018年第2期
页码:
87-96
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-04-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on theIntegration of Ethnic Chinese Groupsin Singaporeunder the Idea of ″Salad Bowl″
文章编号:
1671-7287(2018)02-0087-10
作者:
史秋霞
江苏师范大学 哲学与公共管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116
Author(s):
SHI Qiuxia
School of Philosophy and Public Administration Sociology, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
关键词:
族群融合 社会环境 华族社群 双重压力 融合裂痕
Keywords:
ethnic integration social environment ethnic Chinese groups double pressure integration rift
分类号:
D523.8
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在“沙拉碗”式融合理念下,新加坡华族社群融合既包括新移民融入新加坡华人社会,也涉及华族成员在该体系中的流动。受外部环境与华族社群的双重冲击,新加坡华族底层成员最有可能面临向下流动的风险,而新移民在承受更多的政策压力下融入进程延长,甚至中断。新老华族清晰的群体边界及内耗型互动也在社会事件与日常交往中不断强化,且影响着华族整体凝聚力的提升。
Abstract:
Under the idea of ″salad bowl″, the integration of the ethnic Chinese groupsin Singapore includes not only new immigrants integrating into the Chinese community, but also Chinese members flowing within this system. With the double impact of the external environment and ethnic Chinese groups, members from the bottom of the community most likely to face the risk of downward mobility, and the process of integration of new immigrants has been extended or even interrupted under more policy pressure. The clear group boundary in old and new Chinese and internal friction interaction continue to strengthen in the social events and daily contacts, and affect the promotion of community cohesion.

参考文献/References:

[1]任远,邬民乐.城市流动人口的社会融合:文献述评[J].人口研究, 2006,30(3):87-94.
[2]黄朝翰, 赵力涛. 新加坡社会发展转型[M].新加坡: 八方文化创作室, 2013:64.
[3]梁永佳,阿嘎佐诗.在种族与国族之间:新加坡多元种族主义政策[J]. 西北民族研究, 2013(2):88-98.
[4]小木裕文, 刘晓民. 新加坡的中国新移民[J]. 南洋资料译丛,2003(1):22-28.
[5]PARK R E.Human migration and the marginal man[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1928,33(6):881-893.
[6]WARNER W L.The social systems of American ethnic groups[M]. New Haven:Yale University Press,1945.
[7]GORDON M M.Assimilation in American life [M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1964.
[8]GANS H J.Second-generation decline: scenarios for the economic and ethnic futures of the post-1965 American immigrants[J].Ethnic & Racial Studies,1992,15(2):173-192.
[9]PERLMANN J, WALDINGER R.Second generation decline? children of immigrants, past and present-a reconsideration[J]. International Migration Review, 1997,31(4):893-922.
[10]ALBA R,NEE V.Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration[J]. International Migration Review, 1997, 31(4):137-160.
[11]PORTES A,ZHOU M.The new second generation:segmented assimilation and its variants[J].Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 1993,530:74-96.
[12]PORTES A,RUMBAUT R G.Immigrant America:a portrait[M].California:University of California Press, 2014.
[13]MISHEL L,BIVENS J,GOULD E,et al.The state of working America[M]. London and New York: Routledge,1993:79-80.
[14]WATERS M C.Ethnic and racial identities of second-generation black immigrants in New York city[J]. International Migration Review, 1994, 28(4):795-820.
[15]ZHOU M.Segmented assimilation: issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation [J].International Migration Review, 1997, 31(4):975-971.
[16]HILL M,FEE L M.The politics of nation building and citizenship in Singapore[M]. London and New York: Routledge,1995:31.
[17]吴前进. 1990年以来中国—新加坡民间关系的发展:以中国新移民与当地华人社会的互动为例[J].社会科学, 2006(10):85-93.
[18]刘宏.新加坡的中国新移民形象:当地的视野与政策的考量[J].南洋问题研究, 2012(2):69-77.
[19]范磊.新加坡的中国新移民: 认同困境与治理路径[J].International Journal of Diasporic Chinese Studies, 2013, 5(2):23-43.
[20]RAHMAN MD M,TONG CHEE KIONG.Integration policy in Singapore: a transnational inclusion approach[J]. Asian Ethnicity, 2013, 14(1):80-98.
[21]SOLON G. A model of intergenerational mobility variation over time and place[EB/OL].[2017-06-19].http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gsolon/workingpapers/ottawa.pdf.
[22]NG I Y H.Education and intergenerational mobility in Singapore[J]. Educational Review,2014,66(3):362-376.
[23]林琳. 侨这三十年[M].香港:中国评论学术出版社, 2008:125.
[24]刘宏.华人新移民的跨国流动和调适模式:英国与新加坡的比较分析[M]//李元瑾,廖建裕.华人移民比较研究:适应与发展.新加坡:华裔馆,2010:163.
[25]莊永康.新加坡华社研究[M].新加坡:教育出版社,2002:26-28.
[26]刘宏.跨国华人社会场域的动力与变迁:新加坡的个案分析[J].东南亚研究,2013(4):56-67.
[27]ORTIGA Y Y. Multiculturalism on its head:unexpected boundaries and new migration in Singapore[J].Journal of International Migration & Integration, 2015, 16(4):947-963.
[28]PORTES A,ZHOU M.The new second generation[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation Publications,1996:163.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期]2017-07-29
[基金项目]国家社会科学基金青年项目“新型城镇化进程中不同社会群体间社会距离及其弥合机制研究”(15CSH006);江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目“新型城镇化进程中农民工随迁子女教育公平及保障机制研究”(2016SJB840011)
[作者简介]史秋霞(1982-),女,内蒙古乌海人,江苏师范大学哲学与公共管理学院副教授,博士,研究方向:城乡社会学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-10