|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]曹顺仙,陈崇天.以“负责任创新”推进生态文明示范区的创新发展[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(2):51-56.
 CAO Shunxian,CHEN Chongtian.Promoting the Innovation and Development of Ecological Civilization Demonstration Area with RRI[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2018,17(2):51-56.
点击复制

以“负责任创新”推进生态文明示范区的创新发展()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
17
期数:
2018年第2期
页码:
51-56
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-04-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Promoting the Innovation and Development of Ecological Civilization Demonstration Area with RRI
文章编号:
1671-7287(2018)02-0051-06
作者:
曹顺仙陈崇天
南京林业大学 江苏环境与发展研究中心, 江苏 南京 210037
Author(s):
CAO ShunxianCHEN Chongtian
Research Center for Jiangsu Environment and Development, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
关键词:
负责任创新 生态文明示范区 伦理正当性 生态文明建设
Keywords:
RRI ecological civilization demonstration area the property of ethics ecological civilization development
分类号:
F124.3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
“负责任创新”(RRI)是近年来欧美学者试图破解创新风险和弥补可持续发展理论缺陷而提出的理念,是欧美谋求成为世界最先进知识体而应用于政策、策略制定的新理论。生态文明示范区的发展既依赖于创新驱动,又面临着日趋复杂和不确定的创新风险。将“负责任创新”嵌入生态文明示范区的创新发展既是由两者内在关系逻辑和时代特性所决定的重要理论问题,也是生态文明示范区在先行先试的进程中防范科技创新风险和泡沫,确保其协调可持续发展的现实需要,是避免生态文明示范区的创新发展沦为“没有灵魂的卓越”的重要途径。
Abstract:
RRI is an idea that some European and American scholars came up with in recent yearsin order to reduce science and technology innovation risks and make up for the defects of the sustainable development theories. It is also a new theory which can be used in policy making as it can help the European countries and the USA become the world′s most advanced countries of knowledge. The development of ecological civilization demonstration area relies on innovation but faces innovation risks with increasing complexity and uncertainty.The introduction of RRI into the innovation and development of ecological civilization demonstration area is an important theoretical question striked by the internal logic relations between the two and the currentera traits. What′s more, it is also an important approach to guarding against technological innovation risks and foams, so as to gurantee sustainable development and to prevent the innovation and development from becoming an ″excellence without soul″.

参考文献/References:

[1]Hellström T. Systemic innovation and risk:technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation [J].Technology in Society,2003,25(3):369-384.
[2]GUSTON D H, FISHER E,GRUNWALD A,et al. Responsible innovation:motivations for a new journal[J]. Journal of Responsible Innovation,2014,1(1):1-8.
[3]习近平.在中国科学院第十七次院士大会、中国工程院第十二次院士大会上的讲话[N].光明日报,2014-06-10(001).
[4]EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Directorate-general for research and innovation,ethical and regulatory challenges to science and research policy at the global level [R]. Brussels: European Commission,2012:10-11.
[5]STILGOE J,OWEN R,MACNAGHTEN P.Developing a framework for responsible innovation [J].Research Policy,2013,42(9):1568-1580.
[6]MAYNARD A,HARPER T. Building a sustainable future:rethinking the role of technology innovation in a increasingly interdependent[R].Swiss:World Economic Forum Global Agenda Council,2011:1-14.
[7]米切姆.工程与哲学:历史的、哲学的和批判的视角[M].王前,译.北京:人民出版社,2013:433.
[8]陈吉宁.努力打造生态文明建设示范区升级版[EB/OL].[2017-07-03].http://env.people.com.cn/n/2015/0515/c1010-27006267.html.
[9]曹顺仙.深化生态文明研究的理论体系与方法[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2016(2):86-89.
[10]高兆明.生态保护伦理责任:一种实践视阈的考察[J].哲学研究,2009(6):103-108.
[11]王毅.用制度保障生态文明建设[N].人民日报,2015-06-09(007).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
[收稿日期]2018-01-29
[基金项目]教育部高校示范马克思主义学院和优秀教学科研团队建设项目“双主体‘问题+’复合教学模式的建构”(17JDSZK115);国家林业局科技司林业软科学研究项目“发达国家与发展中国家生态文明理论与实践的比较研究”(2014-R10);南京林业大学2016年思想政治理论课建设与改革专项研究课题重点资助项目“生态文明的话语分析:基于环境政治学的视角”(2016ZD002)
[作者简介]曹顺仙(1963-),女,江苏宜兴人,南京林业大学江苏环境与发展研究中心教授,博士,研究方向:环境哲学/环境伦理、马克思主义理论。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-10