|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]徐淋,吴颍宣,刘春林.基于董事关联网络的上市企业社会责任信息披露研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(2):76-83.
 XU Lin,WU Yingxuan,LIU Chunlin.On Board Interlock and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting of Chinese Listed Companies[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2017,(2):76-83.
点击复制

基于董事关联网络的上市企业社会责任信息披露研究()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2017年第2期
页码:
76-83
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-06-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Board Interlock and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting of Chinese Listed Companies
文章编号:
1671-7287(2017)02-0076-08
作者:
徐淋吴颍宣刘春林
南京大学 商学院, 江苏 南京 210093
Author(s):
XU Lin WU Yingxuan LIU Chunlin
Business School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
关键词:
董事关联网络 中心性 结构洞 社会责任信息披露 盈利能力
Keywords:
board interlock centrality structural hole CSR reporting financial performance
分类号:
F233
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于2010—2012年中国沪深A股市场的上市公司为样本构建了关联董事网络,探讨了企业在该网络中的中心位置和结构洞位置与社会责任信息披露水平之间的关系。实证结果表明:企业所处的网络中心位置和结构洞位置对企业的信息披露水平的影响并不相同,越处于中心位置的企业信息披露水平越低,而越处于结构洞位置的企业信息披露水平越高。另外,研究发现,企业盈利能力对上述关系具有一定的调节作用,盈利能力会负向调节企业的网络中心度与社会责任信息披露水平之间的关系,而对结构洞丰富度与社会责任信息披露水平之间的关系则起到了正向调节作用。该研究不仅在一定程度上拓宽了前人的研究成果,同时对中国解决上市企业的信息披露问题提供了重要的指导意义。
Abstract:
Based on samples of the Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2012, we construct the network of board interlock, and discuss the relationship between firm network positions and corporate social responsibility(CSR)reporting behaviors. The empirical analysis shows that firms occupying a central position are more likely to engage in CSR reporting behaviors. In contrast, firms occupying a structural-hole-abundant network position are less likely to engage in CSR reporting behaviors. Moreover, we also explore the moderating effect of firm′s financial performance. We find that the negative relationship between firm centrality and CSR reporting behaviors increases with the level of the firm′s financial performance, while the positive relationship between firm abundance of structural holes and CSR reporting behaviors increases with the level of the firm′s financial performance. Our findings not only expand previous studies of firm CSR reporting behaviors, but also provide crucial reference for the government to solve the CSR reporting problems of Chinese listed firms.

参考文献/References:

[1]SEE G. Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: is there really a link?[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 89: 1-22.
[2]MARQUIS C, YIN L, DONGNING Y. Cosco: implementing sustainability[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2011,4(2):132-144.
[3]GAO Y. Philanthropic disaster relief giving as a response to institutional pressure: evidence from China[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(12): 1377-1382.
[4]MARQUIS C, QIAN C. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: symbol or substance?[J]. Organization Science, 2013, 25(1): 127-148.
[5]MARTIN G, Gözübüyük R, BECERRA M. Interlocks and firm performance: the role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(2): 235-253.
[6]YANG H, LIN Z J, PENG M W. Behind acquisitions of alliance partners: exploratory learning and network embeddedness[J]. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 2011, 54(5): 1069-1080.
[7]SHARMA M, JOSHI S. Creating silicon valley in Europe: public policy towards new technology industries[J]. International Journal of Social Economics, 2012, 39(9):738-740.
[8]XIAO Z, TSUI A S. When brokers may not work: the cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms[J]. Administrative Science Quart-erly, 2007, 52(1): 1-31.
[9]LI H, MENG L, WANG Q, et al. Political connections, financing and firm performance: evidence from Chinese private firms[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2008, 87(2): 283-299.
[10]LI H, ZHANG Y. The role of managers political networking and functional expericence in new venture performance: evidence from China′s transition economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(8):791.
[11]HE Y, TIAN Z. Government-oriented corporate public relation strategies in transitional China[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2008, 4(3): 367-391.
[12]LIN L W. Corporate social responsibility in China: window dressing or structural change[J]. Berkeley Journal of International Law,2010,28(3):64.
[13]FOMBRUN C J, GARDBERG N A, BARNETT M L. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk[J]. Business & Society Review, 2000, 105(1):85-106.
[14]GNYAWALI D R, MADHAVAN R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.
[15]钱锡红, 杨永福, 徐万里. 企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效:一个交互效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2010(5):118-129.
[16]党兴华, 常红锦. 网络位置、地理临近性与企业创新绩效:一个交互效应模型[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(3):7-13.
[17]SHROPSHIRE C. The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(2): 246-264.
[18]BRANDT L, LI H. Bank discrimination in transition economies: ideology, information, or incentives[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, 31(3): 387-413.
[19]REN B, AU K Y, BIRTCH T A. China′s business network structure during institutional transitions[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2009, 26(2): 219-240.
[20]任兵,区玉辉,彭维刚.连锁董事、区域企业间连锁董事网与区域经济发展:对上海和广东两地2001年上市公司的实证考察[J]. 管理世界,2004(3):112-123.
[21]OKHMATOVSKIY I. Performance implications of ties to the government and SOES: a political embeddedness perspective[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2010, 47(6): 1020-1047.
[22]RALSTON D A, TERPSTRA-TONG J, TERPSTRA R H, et al. Today′s state-owned enterprises of China: are they dying dinosaurs or dynamic dynamos[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(9): 825-843.
[23]BURT R S. Structural hole[M]. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
[24]杨建君, 杨慧军, 马婷. 集体主义文化和个人主义文化对技术创新方式的影响:信任的调节[J]. 管理科学, 2013(6):1-11.
[25]SHI W, MARKOCZY L, DESS G G. The role of middle management in the strategy process: group affiliation,structural holes, and tertius iungens[J]. Journal of Management, 2009,35(6):1453-1480.
[26]BATJARGAL B. The Effects of network′s structural holes: polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2010, 4(2): 146-163.
[27]GULATI R, DIALDIN D A, WANG L. Organizational networks[M]. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, 2002: 281-303.
[28]STOVEL K, GOLUB B, MILGROM E M M. Stabilizing brokerage[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(Sup 4): 21326-21332.
[29]HUANG Y. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: entrepreneurship and the state[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[30]WANG H, QIAN C. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: the roles of stakeholder response and political access[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(6): 1159-1181.
[31]樊纲, 王小鲁, 张立文,等.中国各地区市场化相对进程报告[J]. 经济研究,2003(3):9-18.
[32]FREEMAN L C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1979, 1(3): 215-239.
[33]DESS G G, BEARD D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984,29(1): 52-73.
[34]陈凌, 陈华丽. 家族涉入、社会情感财富与企业慈善捐赠行为:基于全国私营企业调查的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(8): 90-101.
[35]ALAUDDIN M,HONG S N.Do instructional attributes pose multicollinearity problems?an empirical exploration[J].Economic Analysis & Policy,2010,40(3):351-361.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2017-01-18
【作者简介】徐淋(1990-),男,江苏南通人,南京大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向:战略和创新管理、环境经济。
【基金项目】国家自然科学基金项目(71272108;71072038)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20