|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘小冰,纪潇雅.生态环境司法保护公益金的制度分析[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(2):13-21.
 LIU Xiaobing,JI Xiaoya.An Institutional Analysis of the Judicial Protection of Public Welfare Funds for Ecological Environment[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2017,(2):13-21.
点击复制

生态环境司法保护公益金的制度分析()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2017年第2期
页码:
13-21
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-06-12

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Institutional Analysis of the Judicial Protection of Public Welfare Funds for Ecological Environment
文章编号:
1671-7287(2017)02-0013-09
作者:
刘小冰纪潇雅
南京工业大学 法学院, 江苏 南京 211800
Author(s):
LIU Xiaobing JI Xiaoya
School of Law, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China
关键词:
环境司法保护 环境保护公益金 环境损害赔偿 生态环境保护
Keywords:
environmental judicial protection environmental protection of public welfare funds compensation for environmental damage ecological environment protection
分类号:
D922.68
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
环境公益诉讼案件的增加,使得通过司法程序获得的生态环境修复费用等涉及公共利益的资金也急剧增加。然而,该笔资金向谁支付、如何使用、谁来监督等一系列问题仍未被厘清,致使资金使用混乱,未能实现应有的生态修复等功能。因此,应细化“生态环境法律保护公益金”这一概念,以专门账户设立“生态环境司法保护公益金”,明确资金使用主体、使用方式、使用程序、监督制度和责任制度,将环境类诉讼和生态修复衔接起来,以加强资金监督,发挥资金效用。
Abstract:
The increase of environmental public interest litigation cases has led to a sharp increase in funds related to public interest in the restoration of ecological environment through judicial process. However, a series of issues remain to be clarified as to whom should the funds be paid, how to use them and who will supervisee them, resulting in fund-using chaos and failure to achieve the ecological restoration and other functions. Therefore, it is necessary to refine the concept of ″public welfare funds for judicial protection of ecological environment″ in order to establish a special account to ensure a judicial protection, to clarify the subjects, purposes, procedures, supervision and responsibility system of the fund-using,to link up environmental litigation and ecological restoration, to strengthen the supervision of the funds and to make full use of them.

参考文献/References:

[1]吕忠梅.环境司法理性不能止于“天价”赔偿:泰州环境公益诉讼案评析[J].中国法学,2016(3):244-264.
[2]马淑亚,殷树森,王波.环境公益诉讼赔偿款项如何管理使用[N].检察日报,2017-04-23(003).
[3]王树义.论生态文明建设与环境司法改革[J].中国法学,2014(3):54-71.
[4]中华环保联合会课题组,胡中华.环境公益诉讼损害赔偿金研究[J].中国环境法治,2014(2):119-148.
[5]李苑,印锋.泰州规范环境公益诉讼资金管理[N].中国环境报,2016-04-13(006).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2017-04-16
【作者简介】刘小冰(1962-),男,江苏高淳人,南京工业大学法学院教授,研究方向:宪法与行政法、环境资源法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-20