|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]保罗·柏格特,著,张卓远,等.马克思主义、政治经济学和人类可持续发展[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(3):30-40.
 Paul Berger,translated by ZHANG Zhuoyuan.Marxism, Political Economy and Human Sustainable Development[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2017,(3):30-40.
点击复制

马克思主义、政治经济学和人类可持续发展()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2017年第3期
页码:
30-40
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Marxism, Political Economy and Human Sustainable Development
文章编号:
1671-7287(2017)03-0030-11
作者:
保罗·柏格特1著;张卓远2
1.印第安纳州立大学 经济学院, 美国 泰瑞豪特 47809; 2.山西大学 马克思主义哲学研究所, 山西 太原 030006
Author(s):
Paul Berger1; translated by ZHANG Zhuoyuan2
1.School of Economics, Indiana State University, Terre haute 47809, USA; 2.Institute of Marxist Philosophy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
关键词:
马克思主义 政治经济学 可持续发展
Keywords:
Marxism political economics sustainable development
分类号:
F0-0
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
可持续发展在生态经济学中有三个维度:自然资源作为人类现在和未来发展的公共资源;人类个体、社会和自然的协同进化;自然资源中共同财产的必要性和功能性要求。在当今的时代背景下,资本主义功能化和公共财产的反资本主义特征形成鲜明对比。马克思和恩格斯的共产主义以人类全面发展为理想,共产主义所有制的公共维度与作为生产力发展条件的个体全面发展联系在一起,使人性与自然达到内在统一,提高了可持续发展三个维度的整合性,促进了人类可持续发展。
Abstract:
Sustainable development has three dimensions in ecological economics: natural resources as public resources for human development; synergetic evolution of human individuals, society and nature; necessity and functional requirements of common property in natural resources. In the context of current times, the functionalization of capitalism is in sharp contrast to the anti-capitalist character of public property. Marx and Engels′ theory of communism takes the fully development of mankind as its ideal. The public dimension of communist ownership is linked with the individual development as the condition of the development of productive forces. The integration of humanity and nature has been achieved, which has improved the integration of three dimensions of sustainable development and promoted sustainable development of human society.

参考文献/References:

[1]JEROEN C J M VAN DEN BERGH,FERRER-I-CARBONELLI A,MUNDA G.Alternative models of individual behavior and implications for environmental policy[J].Ecological Economics,2000,32(1):43-61.
[2] GOWDY J,ERICKSON J D.The approach of ecological economics[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,2005,29(2):207-222.
[3]NORGAARD R B.Beyond materialism: a coevolutionary reinterpretation of the environmental crisis[J].Review of Social Economy,1995,53(4):475-492.
[4]SWANEY J A.Common property, reciprocity, and community[J].Journal of Economic Issues,1990,24(2):451-462.
[5]AGUILERA-KLINK F.Some notes on the misuse of classic writings in economics on the subject of common property[J].Ecological Economics,1994,9(3):221-228.
[6]OSTROM E.Governing the commons[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1990.
[7]ADGER W N,LUTTRELL C.Property rights and the utilization of wetlands[J].Ecological Economics,2000,35(1):75-89.
[8]BEAUMONT P M,WALKER R T.Land degradation and property regimes[J].Ecological Economics,1996,18(1):55-66.
[9]CHAKRABORTY R N.Stability and outcomes of common property institutions in forestry:evidence from the Terai Region in Nepal[J]. Ecological Economics,2001,36(2):341-353.
[10]WADE R.The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics,1987,11(2):95-106.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 宁.阿多诺的“否定哲学”与批判理论的思辨转向[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,(02):40.
[2]唐正东.马克思主义辩证思维方法的一般特点和基本规律———兼论习近平同志的辩证思想[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(3):13.
 [J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2015,(3):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2017-03-26
【作者简介】保罗·柏格特(1956-),男,印第安纳州立大学经济学院教授,研究方向:生态社会主义、生态经济学、马克思主义经济学。张卓远(1987-),女,山西晋中人,山西大学马克思主义哲学研究所博士研究生,研究方向:马克思主义哲学。
【基金项目】国家社会科学基金重大项目(2015MZD026)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-20