|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]霍华德•拉丁,著,王 慧,等.环境规制的理想效率和现实效率[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(2):19-35.
 Howard Latin,.Wanghui,Li Mengqi.Idea Efficiency and Real Efficiency of Environmental Regulation[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2016,15(2):19-35.
点击复制

环境规制的理想效率和现实效率()
分享到:

《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1671-7287/CN:]

卷:
15
期数:
2016年第2期
页码:
19-35
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-06-24

文章信息/Info

Title:
Idea Efficiency and Real Efficiency of Environmental Regulation
作者:
霍华德•拉丁著1;王 慧李梦琦译2
(1.罗格斯大学 法学院,新泽西 08102 ;2.上海海事大学 法学院,上海 201306)
Author(s):
Howard Latin1;.Wanghui2Li Mengqi2
(Rutgers University, School of Law,New Jersey,08102;2. Shanghai Maritime University, School of Law 201306)
关键词:
环境规制环境保护环境政策“微调”改革理想效率现实效率
Keywords:
Environmental Regulation Environmental Protection Environmental PolicyFine-Turning ReformIdea EfficiencyReal Efficiency
摘要:
环境规制改革的倡导者过于强调理论效率,对实际的决策成本和执法限制未给予足够的关注。尽管现行的环境规制方法存在一定的缺陷,但是这并不意味其它规制方法的效果更佳。在环境规制实践中,关键的问题不是哪个规制方法接近理想中的“效率”,而是哪种方法最有可能在实践中有效。
Abstract:
’environmental regulatory reform’ pay more attention to theoretical efficiency, place inadequate emphasis on actual decision-making costs and implementation constraints. Although existing environmental regulation approach have some defects, but it doesn’t mean that any other approach would necessarily perform better. During the practice process of environmental regulation, the critical issue is not which regulatory system aspires to ideal ’efficiency’ but which is most likely to prove effective

参考文献/References:

[1]BREYER S G.Regulation and its reform[M].Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1982:115-116.
[2]STEWART R B.Regulation,innovation, and administrative law: a conceptual framework[J].California Law Review,1981,69(5):1256-1377.
[3]LATIN H A.Environmental deregulation and consumer decision making under uncertainty[J].Harvard Environment Law Review,1982,62(2):187-239.
[4]LINDBLOM C E.The Science of "Muddling Through"[J].Public Administration Review,2010,19(2):79-88.
[5]BADGER D.New source standard for power plants I: consider the costs [J].Harvard Environment Law Review,1979(3):63-83.
[6]ACKERMAN B A,HASSLER W T.Clean coal/dirty air [M].New Haven:Yale University Press,1981:2.
[7]SCHOENBROD D.Goal statutes or rules statutes: the case of the clean air act[J]. UCLA Law Review,1983,30:740-828.
[8]CURRIE D P. Air pollution:federal law and analysis[M].Washington,D.C.:Callaghan & Company,1981:7-26.
[9]ZEMANSKY G M,ZERBR R O.Adjudicatory hearings as part of the NPDES premit process[J].Ecology Law Quarterly,1980,9(1):1-66.
[10]WESSINGER H J.Wastewater dischargers are not complying with EPA pollution control permits[R].Washington,D.C.:United States General Accounting Office,1983:32-33.

相似文献/References:

[1]高凛.多边贸易体制下碳关税的法律分析[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(02):37.
 [J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2013,(2):37.
[2]高琪.我国环境决策中公众参与制度的立法分析——兼评《环境保护法》修订案的相关规定[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(04):14.
 [J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2014,(2):14.
[3]顾金土1,罗 静2,Geir Inge Orderud3.基于异地调水工程的水缘关系研究———以天津于桥水库为例[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(2):63.
 [J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2015,(2):63.
[4]童志锋.中国农村水污染防治政策的发展与挑战[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(1):89.
[5]丹尼尔·法伯,著,梁增然,等.气候适应与联邦制[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016,15(3):40.
[6]邹彩芬,余茜.环境规制对技术创新的影响:分行业研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(2):70.
 ZOU Caifen,YU Qian.Impact of Environmental Regulation on Technological Innovation: An Industry Analysis[J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2017,(2):70.
[7]柯 坚,刘志坚.我国环境法学研究十年(2008—2017年):热议题与冷思考[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,17(1 ):52.
 [J].Journal of NANJING TECH UNIVERSITY(SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION),2018,17(2):52.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
【收稿日期】2016-03-30作者简介】霍华德·拉丁(1944-),男,罗格斯大学法学院教授,研究方向:环境法。王慧(1981-),男,甘肃靖远人,上海海事大学法学院副教授,博士,研究方向:环境法、气候变化法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-06-25